Detecting Variability in Massive Astronomical Time-Series Data II: Variable Candidates in the Northern Sky Variability Survey
Min-Su Shin (1), Hahn Yi (2), Dae-Won Kim (2,3), Seo-Won Chang (2),, Yong-Ik Byun (2) ((1) University of Michigan, (2) Yonsei University, (3), Harvard/CfA)

TL;DR
This paper presents a clustering-based variability analysis of over 16 million light curves from the NSVS, identifying about 10% as variable candidates and providing a public database for further research.
Contribution
Introduces a novel clustering method to identify variable candidates in massive astronomical time-series data and cross-correlates with multiple surveys for enhanced classification.
Findings
Approximately 1.8 million variable candidates identified.
Cross-matching with other surveys improves candidate classification.
Public online database available for further exploration.
Abstract
We present variability analysis of data from the Northern Sky Variability Survey (NSVS). Using the clustering method which defines variable candidates as outliers from large clusters, we cluster 16,189,040 light curves, having data points at more than 15 epochs, as variable and non-variable candidates in 638 NSVS fields. Variable candidates are selected depending on how strongly they are separated from the largest cluster and how rarely they are grouped together in eight dimensional space spanned by variability indices. All NSVS light curves are also cross-correlated to the Infrared Astronomical Satellite, AKARI, Two Micron All Sky Survey, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and Galaxy Evolution Explorer objects as well as known objects in the SIMBAD database. The variability analysis and cross-correlation results are provided in a public online database which can be used to select…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
