A comparison between star formation rate diagnostics and rate of core collapse supernovae within 11 Mpc
M. T. Botticella, S. J. Smartt, R. C. Kennicutt Jr., E. Cappellaro, M., Sereno, J. C. Lee

TL;DR
This study compares star formation rate diagnostics with core collapse supernova rates within 11 Mpc, finding consistent lower mass limits for supernova progenitors around 8 solar masses, validating supernovae as SFR tracers.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of multiple SFR diagnostics with CCSN rates in a complete local galaxy sample, constraining progenitor mass limits.
Findings
CCSN rate matches FUV-based SFR assuming 8 Msun progenitors.
Halpha-based SFR is about half of FUV and TIR estimates.
Minimum progenitor mass for CCSNe is constrained to 8 +/- 1 Msun.
Abstract
The core collapse supernova (CCSN) rate provides a strong lower limit for the star formation rate (SFR). Progress in using it as a cosmic SFR tracer requires some confidence that it is consistent with more conventional SFR diagnostics in the nearby Universe. This paper compares standard SFR measurements based on Halpha, FUV and TIR galaxy luminosities with the observed CCSN rate in the same galaxy sample. The comparison can be viewed from two perspectives. Firstly, by adopting an estimate of the minimum stellar mass to produce a CCSN one can determine a SFR from SN numbers. Secondly, the radiative SFRs can be assumed to be robust and then the SN statistics provide a constrain on the minimum stellar mass for CCSN progenitors. The novel aspect of this study is that Halpha, FUV and TIR luminosities are now available for a complete galaxy sample within the local 11Mpc volume and the number…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
