The RMS Survey: Resolving kinematic distance ambiguities towards a sample of compact HII regions using HI absorption
J. S. Urquhart (1,2), M. G. Hoare (3), S. L. Lumsden (3), R. D., Oudmaijer (3), T. J. T. Moore (4), J. C. Mottram (5), H. D. B. Cooper (3), M., Mottram (3), H. C. Rogers (3) ((1) CASS, (2) MPIfR, (3) Leeds, (4) Liverpool, John Moores, (5) Exeter)

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution HI data from the Australia Telescope Compact Array to resolve distance ambiguities for compact HII regions in the RMS survey, aiding in mapping massive star formation in the Galaxy.
Contribution
It provides the first high-resolution HI absorption analysis for nearly all sources in a large, complete sample of compact HII regions, improving distance determinations.
Findings
Resolved distance ambiguities for most sources in the sample.
Enhanced the accuracy of Galactic massive star formation distribution.
Combined high and low-resolution HI data for comprehensive analysis.
Abstract
We present high-resolution HI data obtained using the Australia Telescope Compact Array to resolve the near/far distance ambiguities towards a sample of compact HII regions from the Red MSX Source (RMS) survey. The high resolution data are complemented with lower resolution archival HI data extracted from the Southern and VLA Galactic Plane surveys. We resolve the distance ambiguity for nearly all of the 105 sources where the continuum was strong enough to allow analysis of the HI absorption line structure. This represents another step in the determination of distances to the total RMS sample, which with over 1,000 massive young stellar objects and compact HII regions, is the largest and most complete sample of its kind. The full sample will allow the distribution of massive star formation in the Galaxy to be examined.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
