Resolving astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection
Mads T. Frandsen, Felix Kahlhoefer, Christopher McCabe, Subir Sarkar,, Kai Schmidt-Hoberg

TL;DR
This paper examines how uncertainties in the galactic dark matter velocity distribution affect direct detection experiment interpretations, proposing a framework to compare results without assuming specific halo models.
Contribution
It introduces a method to explicitly incorporate astrophysical uncertainties into dark matter detection data analysis, enabling more consistent comparisons across experiments.
Findings
DAMA, CoGeNT, and CRESST-II results can align with anisotropic velocity distributions.
Constraints from CDMS and XENON remain robust despite astrophysical uncertainties.
The framework allows for a more model-independent interpretation of detection results.
Abstract
We study the impact of the assumed velocity distribution of galactic dark matter particles on the interpretation of results from nuclear recoil detectors. By converting experimental data to variables that make the astrophysical unknowns explicit, different experiments can be compared without implicit assumptions concerning the dark matter halo. We extend this framework to include the annual modulation signal, as well as multiple target elements. Recent results from DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II can be brought into agreement if the velocity distribution is very anisotropic and thus allows a large modulation fraction. However constraints from CDMS and XENON cannot be evaded by appealing to such astrophysical uncertainties alone.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
