A Revised View of the Transient Radio Sky
D. A. Frail, S. R. Kulkarni, E. O. Ofek, G. C. Bower, E. Nakar

TL;DR
This paper re-analyzes archival VLA data on long-duration radio transients, revealing many are artifacts and refining the transient rate, emphasizing the need for careful data validation and multi-wavelength follow-up in future surveys.
Contribution
The study critically reassesses previous radio transient detections, reducing false positives and providing a more accurate estimate of their occurrence rate, guiding future observational strategies.
Findings
Over half of the reported transients are data artifacts.
Most remaining sources have lower SNR than initially reported.
The true rate of such transients is comparable to recent discoveries like Swift J1644+57.
Abstract
We report on a re-analysis of archival data from the Very Large Array for a sample of ten long duration radio transients reported by Bower and others. These transients have an implied all-sky rate that would make them the most common radio transient in the sky and yet most have no quiescent counterparts at other wavelengths and therefore no known progenitor (other than Galactic neutron stars). We find that more than half of these transients are due to rare data artifacts. The remaining sources have lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than initially reported by 1 to 1.5-sigma. This lowering of SNR matters greatly since the sources are at the threshold. We are unable to decisively account for the differences. By two orthogonal criteria one source appears to be a good detection. Thus the rate of long duration radio transients without optical counterparts is, at best, comparable to that of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
