On the relative importance of excluded minors
Rhiannon Hall, Dillon Mayhew, Stefan H. M. van Zwam

TL;DR
This paper characterizes superfluous subsets within collections of excluded minors in matroid theory, identifying when removing certain minors results in only finitely many 3-connected matroids being excluded.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of superfluous subsets of six well-known collections of excluded minors in matroid theory.
Findings
Identifies superfluous subsets in six key collections of excluded minors
Shows conditions under which minor sets are superfluous
Provides a framework for simplifying excluded minor sets
Abstract
If EE is a set of matroids, then ex(EE) denotes the set of matroids that have no minor isomorphic to a member of EE. If EE' is a subset of EE, we say that EE' is /superfluous/ if ex(EE - EE') - ex(EE) contains only finitely many 3-connected matroids. We characterize the superfluous subsets of six well-known collections of excluded minors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
