
TL;DR
This paper establishes lower bounds for the rank of Mumford--Tate groups of complex abelian varieties, relating it to the dimension and endomorphism properties, with sharp bounds proven.
Contribution
It provides new lower bounds for the rank of Mumford--Tate groups based on the abelian variety's dimension and endomorphism structure, including sharp bounds.
Findings
Lower bound for Mumford--Tate group rank is just below log_2 of the dimension.
If End A is commutative, the rank is at least log_2 of the dimension plus 2.
Results extend to the l-adic monodromy group of abelian varieties over number fields.
Abstract
Let A be a complex abelian variety and G its Mumford--Tate group. Supposing that the simple abelian subvarieties of A are pairwise non-isogenous, we find a lower bound for the rank of G, which is a little less than log_2 dim A. If we suppose that End A is commutative, then we show that rk G >= log_2 dim A + 2, and this latter bound is sharp. We also obtain the same results for the rank of the l-adic monodromy group of an abelian variety defined over a number field. ----- Soit A une vari\'et\'e ab\'elienne complexe et G son groupe de Mumford--Tate. En supposant que les sous vari\'et\'es ab\'eliennes simples de A sont deux \`a deux non-isog\`enes, on trouve une minoration du rang rk G de G, l\'eg\`erement inf\'erieure \`a log_2 dim A. Si on suppose que End A est commutatif, alors on montre que rk G >= log_2 dim A + 2, et cette borne-ci est optimale. On obtient les m\^emes resultats…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
