System size and energy dependence of near-side di-hadron correlations
STAR Collaboration: G. Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, A. V., Alakhverdyants, I. Alekseev, J. Alford, B. D. Anderson, C. D. Anson, D., Arkhipkin, G. S. Averichev, J. Balewski, L. S. Barnby, D. R. Beavis, R., Bellwied, M. J. Betancourt, R. R. Betts, A. Bhasin, A. K. Bhati

TL;DR
This study analyzes near-side di-hadron correlations across different collision systems and energies, revealing consistent jet-like behavior and energy-dependent ridge phenomena, providing insights into particle production mechanisms in heavy-ion collisions.
Contribution
It presents the first systematic comparison of near-side correlations in d+Au, Cu+Cu, and Au+Au collisions at two energies, highlighting the system size and energy dependence of the ridge and jet-like components.
Findings
Jet-like correlation width increases with system size.
Ridge is present in Cu+Cu and lower energy collisions.
Ridge magnitude is smaller at 62.4 GeV compared to 200 GeV.
Abstract
Two-particle azimuthal () and pseudorapidity () correlations using a trigger particle with large transverse momentum () in +Au, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at =\xspace 62.4 GeV and 200~GeV from the STAR experiment at RHIC are presented. The \ns correlation is separated into a jet-like component, narrow in both and , and the ridge, narrow in but broad in . Both components are studied as a function of collision centrality, and the jet-like correlation is studied as a function of the trigger and associated . The behavior of the jet-like component is remarkably consistent for different collision systems, suggesting it is produced by fragmentation. The width of the jet-like correlation is found to increase with the system size. The ridge, previously observed in Au+Au collisions at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
