Variational two-particle density matrix calculation for the Hubbard model below half filling using spin-adapted lifting conditions
Brecht Verstichel, Helen van Aggelen, Ward Poelmans, Dimitri Van, Neck

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that two-index density matrix methods, enhanced with spin-adapted lifting conditions, can accurately capture the physics of the Hubbard model below half filling, especially in the strong-repulsion regime.
Contribution
It introduces spin-adapted lifting conditions to improve two-particle density matrix calculations for the Hubbard model below half filling, enabling accurate results without heavy three-index conditions.
Findings
Two-index approach fails below half filling without additional conditions.
Lifting conditions improve accuracy in the strong-repulsion limit.
Spin-adapted lifting conditions increase accuracy in intermediate regimes.
Abstract
The variational determination of the two-particle density matrix is an interesting, but not yet fully explored technique that allows to obtain ground-state properties of a quantum many-body system without reference to an -particle wave function. The one-dimensional fermionic Hubbard model has been studied before with this method, using standard two- and three-index conditions on the density matrix [J. R. Hammond {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062505 (2006)], while a more recent study explored so-called subsystem constraints [N. Shenvi {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 213003 (2010)]. These studies reported good results even with only standard two-index conditions, but have always been limited to the half-filled lattice. In this Letter we establish the fact that the two-index approach fails for other fillings. In this case, a subset of three-index conditions is absolutely needed to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
