The Spatial Clustering of ROSAT All-Sky Survey AGNs III. Expanded Sample and Comparison with Optical AGNs
Mirko Krumpe, Takamitsu Miyaji, Alison L. Coil, and Hector Aceves

TL;DR
This study investigates the clustering properties of various types of AGNs from the ROSAT and SDSS surveys across a broader redshift range, finding similar clustering behaviors among different AGN classes and confirming weak luminosity dependence.
Contribution
It extends previous clustering analyses of AGNs to higher redshifts and compares X-ray and optical AGNs, revealing consistent clustering properties and halo masses.
Findings
No significant clustering difference between X-ray and optical broad-line AGNs.
Radio-detected AGNs do not show different clustering from non-radio AGNs.
Weak dependence of clustering strength on X-ray luminosity at ~2 sigma.
Abstract
This is the third paper in a series that reports on our investigation of the clustering properties of AGNs identified in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In this paper, we extend the redshift range to 0.07<z<0.50 and measure the clustering amplitudes of both X-ray and optically-selected SDSS broad-line AGNs with and without radio detections as well as for X-ray selected narrow-line RASS/SDSS AGNs. We measure the clustering amplitude through cross-correlation functions (CCFs) with SDSS galaxies and derive the bias by applying a halo occupation distribution (HOD) model directly to the CCFs. We find no statistically convincing difference in the clustering of X-ray and optically-selected broad-line AGNs, as well as with samples in which radio-detected AGNs are excluded. This is in contrast to low redshift optically-selected narrow-line AGNs, where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
