Descent of restricted flat Mittag-Leffler modules and generalized vector bundles
Sergio Estrada, Pedro A. Guil Asensio, Jan Trlifaj

TL;DR
This paper proves that the property of being a restricted flat Mittag-Leffler module or a generalized vector bundle is local on schemes, extending previous results to all infinite cardinals using advanced filtration techniques.
Contribution
It establishes the locality of restricted flat Mittag-Leffler modules and generalized vector bundles for all infinite cardinals, using refined filtration methods instead of traditional de9vissage.
Findings
Confirmed locality for all infinite cardinal restrictions.
Extended previous results to a broader class of modules.
Applied Hill Lemma and c7-filtrations for the proof.
Abstract
A basic question for any property of quasi--coherent sheaves on a scheme is whether the property is local, that is, it can be defined using any open affine covering of . Locality follows from the descent of the corresponding module property: for (infinite dimensional) vector bundles and Drinfeld vector bundles, it was proved by Kaplansky's technique of d\'evissage already in \cite[II.\S3]{RG}. Since vector bundles coincide with -restricted Drinfeld vector bundles, a question arose in \cite{EGPT} of whether locality holds for -restricted Drinfeld vector bundles for each infinite cardinal . We give a positive answer here by replacing the d\' evissage with its recent refinement involving -filtrations and the Hill Lemma.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
