What's Wrong With Black Hole Thermodynamics?
B. H. Lavenda

TL;DR
This paper critiques black hole thermodynamics, highlighting fundamental inconsistencies such as the convexity of entropy and violations of thermodynamic laws, questioning the validity of current models.
Contribution
It identifies key mathematical and conceptual errors in the traditional formulation of black hole entropy and temperature relations.
Findings
Bekenstein entropy is convex, not concave.
Predicted equilibrium temperature violates the third law.
Inconsistencies lead to violations of the second law.
Abstract
Not only is the Bekenstein expression for the entropy of a black hole a convex function of the energy, rather than being a concave function as it must be, it predicts a final equilibrium temperature given by the harmonic mean. This violates the third law, and the principle of maximum work. The property that means are monotonically increasing functions of their argument underscores the error of transferring from temperature means to means in the internal energy when the energy is not a monotonically increasing function of temperature. Whereas the former leads to an increase in entropy, the latter lead to a decrease in entropy thereby violating the second law. The internal energy cannot increase at a slower rate than the temperature itself.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
