Improved precision on the radius of the nearby super-Earth 55 Cnc e
M. Gillon (1), B.-O. Demory (2), B. Benneke (2), D. Valencia (2), D., Deming (3), S. Seager (2), C. Lovis (4), M. Mayor (4), F. Pepe (4), D. Queloz, (4), Damien Segransan (4), S. Udry (4) ((1) University of Liege, (2) MIT, (3), University of Maryland

TL;DR
This study refines the radius measurement of super-Earth 55 Cnc e using new and reanalyzed transit data from Spitzer and MOST, supporting the presence of a water-rich gaseous envelope over a rocky core.
Contribution
It provides improved radius estimates by combining multiple datasets and carefully accounting for systematic effects, confirming the planet's gaseous envelope and potential water composition.
Findings
Refined planet radius to 2.17±0.10 Rearth
Consistent results across infrared and optical data
Supports a water-rich gaseous envelope hypothesis
Abstract
We report on new transit photometry for the super-Earth 55 Cnc e obtained with Warm Spitzer/IRAC at 4.5 microns. An individual analysis of these new data leads to a planet radius of 2.21-0.16+0.15 Rearth, in good agreement with the values previously derived from the MOST and Spitzer transit discovery data. A global analysis of both Spitzer transit time-series improves the precision on the radius of the planet at 4.5 microns to 2.20+-0.12 Rearth. We also performed an independent analysis of the MOST data, paying particular attention to the influence of the systematic effects of instrumental origin on the derived parameters and errors by including them in a global model instead of performing a preliminary detrending-filtering processing. We deduce an optical planet radius of 2.04+0.15 Rearth from this reanalysis of MOST data, which is consistent with the previous MOST result and with our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
