Digging down the past
Orfeu Bertolami

TL;DR
This paper explores the analogy between cosmology and archaeology, analyzing their linguistic similarities and differences, and examining how their theoretical frameworks influence their interpretation of data.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of cosmology and archaeology, focusing on their conceptual parallels and the impact of theoretical guidelines on data interpretation.
Findings
Identifies linguistic similarities between cosmology and archaeology.
Highlights differences in their scientific approaches.
Discusses the influence of theoretical frameworks on data analysis.
Abstract
It is often stated that cosmology is an extreme form of archeology that deals with aeons of time extending back to thousands of millions of years. One talks, for instance, of relics of the early Universe, and phases in the history of the Universe that resemble the division of phases in human development used by archeologists to interpret the data they gather in the field. In this text we shall analyze these "linguistic" similarities, and the differences between these two scientific activities paying some attention on the role played by their theoretical guidelines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Developments in Astronomy · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
