The GALEX Arecibo SDSS Survey. IV. Baryonic Mass-Velocity-Size Relations of Massive Galaxies
Barbara Catinella, Guinevere Kauffmann, David Schiminovich, Jenna, Lemonias, Cecilia Scannapieco, Jing Wang, Silvia Fabello, Cameron Hummels,, Sean M. Moran, Ronin Wu, Andrew P. Cooper, Riccardo Giovanelli, Martha P., Haynes, Timothy M. Heckman, and Am\'elie Saintonge

TL;DR
This study establishes a unified dynamical relation for massive galaxies, linking baryonic mass, velocity, and size, by correcting for morphological differences, revealing a fundamental correlation across galaxy types.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized Faber-Jackson relation applicable to all massive galaxies, regardless of morphology or gas content, with reduced scatter and improved universality.
Findings
BFJ relation less scattered than BTF for the full sample
Applying a concentration-based correction aligns disks and spheroids on the same relation
Disks and spheroids show offset in dispersion-size relation, corrected by dispersions
Abstract
We present dynamical scaling relations for a homogeneous and representative sample of ~500 massive galaxies, selected only by stellar mass (>10^10 Msun) and redshift (0.025<z<0.05) as part of the ongoing GALEX Arecibo SDSS Survey. We compare baryonic Tully-Fisher (BTF) and Faber-Jackson (BFJ) relations for this sample, and investigate how galaxies scatter around the best fits obtained for pruned subsets of disk-dominated and bulge-dominated systems. The BFJ relation is significantly less scattered than the BTF when the relations are applied to their maximum samples, and is not affected by the inclination problems that plague the BTF. Disk-dominated, gas-rich galaxies systematically deviate from the BFJ relation defined by the spheroids. We demonstrate that by applying a simple correction to the stellar velocity dispersions that depends only on the concentration index of the galaxy, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
