Fields of definition for admissible groups
Danny Neftin, Uzi Vishne

TL;DR
This paper explores various notions of admissibility for finite groups over fields, analyzing how different definitions relate and establishing a comprehensive logical framework for these concepts.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of the logical implications between nine variants of admissibility notions over fields.
Findings
Complete determination of implications between admissibility variants
Clarification of how definitions over subfields relate
Framework for understanding admissibility in division algebras
Abstract
A finite group G is admissible over a field M if there is a division algebra whose center is M with a maximal subfield G-Galois over M. We consider nine possible notions of being admissible over M with respect to a subfield K of M, where the division algebra, the maximal subfield or the Galois group are asserted to be defined over K. We completely determine the logical implications between all variants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
