Boundary representations and pure completely positive maps
Craig Kleski

TL;DR
This paper improves the understanding of boundary representations in operator systems by showing the supremum can be replaced with a maximum, confirming the classical boundary concept and enhancing the Krein-Milman theorem for matrix convex sets.
Contribution
It proves that the supremum in Arveson's boundary representation theorem can be replaced by a maximum, strengthening the connection between boundary representations and classical boundaries.
Findings
Supremum can be replaced by maximum in boundary representation theorem.
Choquet boundary for separable operator systems is a classical boundary.
Enhanced Krein-Milman theorem for matrix convex sets.
Abstract
In 2006, Arveson resolved a long-standing problem by showing that for any element of a separable self-adjoint unital subspace , , where runs over the boundary representations for . Here we show that "sup" can be replaced by "max". This implies that the Choquet boundary for a separable operator system is a boundary in the classical sense; a similar result is obtained in terms of pure matrix states when is not assumed to be separable. For matrix convex sets associated to operator systems in matrix algebras, we apply the above results to improve the Webster-Winkler Krein-Milman theorem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Holomorphic and Operator Theory · Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
