No evidence of obscured, accreting black holes in most z=6 star-forming galaxies
Chris J. Willott

TL;DR
This study uses deep X-ray data to investigate the presence of obscured, accreting black holes in z=6 galaxies and finds no evidence supporting their significant population, challenging previous claims.
Contribution
It provides a robust stacking analysis that refutes earlier reports of high black hole density at z=6 due to improved background subtraction methods.
Findings
No stacked X-ray signal detected in z=6 galaxy candidates
Previous claims of significant X-ray signals were due to background subtraction errors
Results suggest a lower black hole density than previously inferred at high redshift
Abstract
It has been claimed that there is a large population of obscured, accreting black holes at high-redshift and that the integrated black hole density at z=6 as inferred from X-ray observations is ~100 times greater than inferred from optical quasars. I have performed a stacking analysis of very deep Chandra X-ray data at the positions of photometrically-selected z=6 galaxy candidates. It is found that there is no evidence for a stacked X-ray signal in either the soft (0.5-2 keV) or hard (2-8 keV) X-ray bands. Previous work which reported a significant signal is affected by an incorrect method of background subtraction which underestimates the true background within the target aperture. The puzzle remains of why the z=6 black hole mass function has such a flat slope and a low normalization compared to the stellar mass function.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
