On the Power of Adaptivity in Sparse Recovery
Piotr Indyk, Eric Price, and David P. Woodruff

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that adaptive measurements significantly reduce the number of measurements needed for sparse recovery, outperforming non-adaptive bounds, with new schemes that operate in fewer rounds and with fewer measurements.
Contribution
It introduces the first adaptive measurement schemes for sparse recovery that outperform non-adaptive bounds, reducing measurements and rounds needed.
Findings
Adaptive schemes use fewer measurements than non-adaptive ones.
New multi-round and two-round algorithms achieve near-optimal measurement bounds.
Improved data stream algorithm for finding duplicates with fewer passes and space.
Abstract
The goal of (stable) sparse recovery is to recover a -sparse approximation of a vector from linear measurements of . Specifically, the goal is to recover such that ||x-x*||_p <= C min_{k-sparse x'} ||x-x'||_q for some constant and norm parameters and . It is known that, for or , this task can be accomplished using non-adaptive measurements [CRT06] and that this bound is tight [DIPW10,FPRU10,PW11]. In this paper we show that if one is allowed to perform measurements that are adaptive, then the number of measurements can be considerably reduced. Specifically, for and we show - A scheme with measurements that uses rounds. This is a significant improvement over the best possible non-adaptive bound. - A scheme with $m=O((1/eps) k log (k/eps)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
