CANDELS Observations of the Structural Properties and Evolution of Galaxies in a Cluster at z=1.62
Casey Papovich (1), R. Bassett (1), J. M. Lotz (2), A. van der Wel, (3), K.-V. Tran (1), S. L. Finkelstein (1,4), E. F. Bell (5), C. J. Conselice, (6), A. Dekel (7), J. S. Dunlop (8), Yicheng Guo (9), S. M. Faber (10), D., Farrah (11), H. C. Ferguson (2), K. D. Finkelstein (1,4)

TL;DR
This study examines the structural properties and evolution of galaxies in a z=1.62 proto-cluster using Hubble data, revealing slower size growth compared to field galaxies and evidence of extended stellar disks.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the size evolution and morphological features of cluster galaxies at high redshift, highlighting the impact of dense environments on galaxy development.
Findings
Cluster galaxies have larger sizes than field galaxies at fixed mass.
Size evolution of quiescent cluster galaxies is slow, following (1+z)^(-0.6+/-0.1).
Cluster galaxies show signs of extended stellar disks and require dry mergers for evolution.
Abstract
We discuss the structural and morphological properties of galaxies in a z=1.62 proto-cluster using near-IR imaging data from Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 data of the Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS). The cluster galaxies exhibit a clear color-morphology relation: galaxies with colors of quiescent stellar populations generally have morphologies consistent with spheroids, and galaxies with colors consistent with ongoing star formation have disk-like and irregular morphologies. The size distribution of the quiescent cluster galaxies shows a deficit of compact (< 1kpc), massive galaxies compared to CANDELS field galaxies at z=1.6. As a result the cluster quiescent galaxies have larger average effective sizes compared to field galaxies at fixed mass at greater than 90% significance. Combined with data from the literature, the size evolution of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
