A General Model for the CO-H2 Conversion Factor in Galaxies with Applications to the Star Formation Law
Desika Narayanan (Arizona), Mark R. Krumholz (UCSC), Eve C. Ostriker, (Maryland), Lars Hernquist (Harvard)

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive model for the CO-H2 conversion factor (Xco) in galaxies, accounting for environmental variables like metallicity and temperature, to improve estimates of molecular gas and star formation laws.
Contribution
It introduces a new, general model for Xco that varies with local galactic conditions, replacing the traditional fixed values for different galaxy types.
Findings
Xco decreases in high-density environments due to temperature and velocity dispersion effects.
Xco increases in low-metallicity environments because of CO photodissociation.
Using the new model yields a continuous star formation law with less scatter.
Abstract
The most common means of converting an observed CO line intensity into a molecular gas mass requires the use of a conversion factor (Xco). While in the Milky Way this quantity does not appear to vary significantly, there is good reason to believe that Xco will depend on the larger-scale galactic environment. Utilising numerical models, we investigate how varying metallicities, gas temperatures and velocity dispersions in galaxies impact the way CO line emission traces the underlying H2 gas mass, and under what circumstances Xco may differ from the Galactic mean value. We find that, due to the combined effects of increased gas temperature and velocity dispersion, Xco is depressed below the Galactic mean in high surface density environments such as ULIRGs. In contrast, in low metallicity environments, Xco tends to be higher than in the Milky Way, due to photodissociation of CO in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
