Dust properties in afterglow of GRB 071025 at z~5
Minsung Jang, Myungshin Im, Induk Lee, Yuji Urata, Lijin Huang,, Hiroyuki Hirashita, Xiaohui Fan, Linhua Jiang

TL;DR
This study confirms that the dust observed in the high-redshift GRB 071025 afterglow likely originated from supernovae, especially those with intermediate progenitor masses, and suggests minimal dust destruction effects.
Contribution
Re-examined the extinction properties of GRB 071025 with new data and tested various supernova dust models, identifying the most plausible progenitor masses and dust formation mechanisms.
Findings
Dust in GRB 071025 is likely from SNe, especially 13 or 25 solar mass models.
Pair-instability SNe models poorly fit the observed data.
Dust destruction by reverse shocks appears negligible in this case.
Abstract
At high redshift, the universe was so young that core-collapse supernovae (SNe) are suspected to be the dominant source of dust production. However, some observations indicate that the dust production by SNe is an inefficient process, casting doubts on the existence of abundant SNe-dust in the early universe. Recently, Perley et al. (2010) reported that the afterglow of GRB 071025 - an unusually red GRB at z ~ 5 - shows evidence for the SNe-produced dust. Since this is perhaps the only high redshift GRB exhibiting compelling evidence for SNe-dust but the result could easily be affected by small systematics in photometry, we re-examined the extinction properties of GRB 071025 using our own optical/near-infrared data at a different epoch. In addition, we tested SNe-dust models with different progenitor masses and dust destruction efficiencies to constrain the dust formation mechanisms. By…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
