What's unusual in online disease outbreak news?
Nigel Collier

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness of online health news monitoring using aberration detection algorithms to improve early outbreak detection and response, demonstrating the potential of automated alerts to supplement manual surveillance.
Contribution
It systematically compares five aberration detection algorithms on real-world online health news data, identifying the most effective methods for outbreak alerting.
Findings
W2 algorithm achieved the highest F1 score.
Day of week effects influence reporting and detection.
Automatic alerts can enhance traditional health surveillance.
Abstract
Background: Accurate and timely detection of public health events of international concern is necessary to help support risk assessment and response and save lives. Novel event-based methods that use the World Wide Web as a signal source offer potential to extend health surveillance into areas where traditional indicator networks are lacking. In this paper we address the issue of systematically evaluating online health news to support automatic alerting using daily disease-country counts text mined from real world data using BioCaster. For 18 data sets produced by BioCaster, we compare 5 aberration detection algorithms (EARS C2, C3, W2, F-statistic and EWMA) for performance against expert moderated ProMED-mail postings. Results: We report sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), mean alerts/100 days and F1, at 95% confidence interval…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
