Stellar Populations of Highly Magnified Lensed Galaxies: Young Starbursts at z~2
Eva Wuyts (1,2), Jane R. Rigby (3), Michael D. Gladders (1,2), David, G. Gilbank (4), Keren Sharon (2), Megan B. Gralla (1,2), Matthew B. Bayliss, (1,2) ((1) University of Chicago, (2) Kavli Institute for Cosmological, Physics, (3) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

TL;DR
This paper provides a detailed analysis of four highly magnified lensed galaxies at z~2, revealing their young stellar populations, starburst nature, and physical conditions through multi-wavelength observations and spectral energy distribution fitting.
Contribution
It offers the first uniform, detailed analysis of a sample of strongly lensed galaxies at z~2, improving understanding of their stellar populations and star formation properties.
Findings
Stellar masses of 3-7×10^9 M_sun
Young ages around 100 Myr
Star formation rates of 20-100 M_sun/yr
Abstract
We present a comprehensive analysis of the rest-frame UV to near-IR spectral energy distributions and rest-frame optical spectra of four of the brightest gravitationally lensed galaxies in the literature: RCSGA 032727-132609 at z=1.70, MS1512-cB58 at z=2.73, SGAS J152745.1+065219 at z=2.76 and SGAS J122651.3+215220 at z=2.92. This includes new Spitzer imaging for RCSGA0327 as well as new spectra, near-IR imaging and Spitzer imaging for SGAS1527 and SGAS1226. Lensing magnifications of 3-4 magnitudes allow a detailed study of the stellar populations and physical conditions. We compare star formation rates as measured from the SED fit, the H-alpha and [OII] emission lines, and the UV+IR bolometric luminosity where 24 micron photometry is available. The SFR estimate from the SED fit is consistently higher than the other indicators, which suggests that the Calzetti dust extinction law used…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
