On the mass of ultra-light bosonic dark matter from galactic dynamics
V. Lora (1), Juan Magana (2), Argelia Bernal (3), F. J., Sanchez-Salcedo (2), E. K. Grebel (1) ((1) Universit\"at Heidelberg, (2), IA UNAM, (3) ICN UNAM)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the mass range of ultra-light scalar particles as dark matter candidates by analyzing galactic dynamics, especially dwarf spheroidal galaxies, using simulations and observational constraints.
Contribution
It establishes a preferred mass range for ultra-light bosonic dark matter particles based on galactic dynamics and simulations, considering both non-interacting and self-interacting scenarios.
Findings
Mass range 0.3x10^-22 eV to 1x10^-22 eV fits galactic observations
Scalar field halos can explain longevity of cold clumps and globular cluster distributions
Results align with cosmic microwave background and substructure suppression constraints
Abstract
We consider the hypothesis that galactic dark matter is composed of ultra-light scalar particles and use internal properties of dwarf spheroidal galaxies to establish a preferred range for the mass m of these bosonic particles. We re-investigate the problem of the longevity of the cold clump in Ursa Minor and the problem of the rapid orbital decay of the globular clusters in Fornax and dwarf ellipticals. Treating the scalar field halo as a rigid background gravitational potential and using N-body simulations, we have explored how the dissolution timescale of the cold clump in Ursa Minor depends on m. It is demonstrated that for masses in the range 0.3x10^-22 eV < m <1x10^-22 eV, scalar field dark halos without self-interaction would have cores large enough to explain the longevity of the cold clump in Ursa Minor and the wide distribution of globular clusters in Fornax, but small enough…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
