Higher-precision radial velocity measurements with the SOPHIE spectrograph using octagonal-section fibers
S. Perruchot, F. Bouchy, B. Chazelas, R.F. Diaz, G. H\'ebrard, K., Arnaud, L. Arnold, G. Avila, X. Delfosse, I. Boisse, G. Moreaux, F. Pepe. Y., Richaud, A. Santerne, R. Sottile, and D. Tezier

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel fiber link design using octagonal-section fibers to enhance the stability and precision of radial velocity measurements with the SOPHIE spectrograph, crucial for exoplanet detection.
Contribution
The study introduces a new fiber link incorporating octagonal fibers to improve scrambling and stability in high-precision spectrographs, validated through on-sky testing.
Findings
Improved radial velocity precision demonstrated on the SOPHIE spectrograph.
Enhanced fiber scrambling properties with octagonal fibers.
Successful on-sky validation with standard star observations.
Abstract
High-precision spectrographs play a key role in exoplanet searches using the radial velocity technique. But at the accuracy level of 1 m.s-1, required for super-Earth characterization, stability of fiber-fed spectrograph performance is crucial considering variable observing conditions such as seeing, guiding and centering errors and, telescope vignetting. In fiber-fed spectrographs such as HARPS or SOPHIE, the fiber link scrambling properties are one of the main issues. Both the stability of the fiber near-field uniformity at the spectrograph entrance and of the far-field illumination on the echelle grating (pupil) are critical for high-precision radial velocity measurements due to the spectrograph geometrical field and aperture aberrations. We conducted tests on the SOPHIE spectrograph at the 1.93-m OHP telescope to measure the instrument sensitivity to the fiber link light feeding…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
