Magnetars: fact or fiction?
H. Tong (IHEP, CAS), R. X. Xu (PKU)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the magnetar model for AXPs and SGRs, discussing observational challenges and considering alternative explanations like quark stars or fallback disks.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of evidence for and against the magnetar model and explores alternative theories for these enigmatic objects.
Findings
Magnetar model faces significant observational challenges.
Alternative models include quark stars and fallback disk systems.
The nature of AXPs and SGRs remains uncertain.
Abstract
Anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) and soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are enigmatic pulsar-like objects. The energy budget is the fundamental problem in their studies. In the magnetar model, they are supposed to be powered by the extremely strong magnetic fields (>~ 10^14 G) of neutron stars. Observations for and against the magnetar model are both summarized. Considering the difficulties encountered by the magnetar model to comfortably understand more and more observations, one may doubt that AXPs and SGRs are really magnetars. If they are not magnetar candidates (including magnetar-based models), then they must be "quark star/fallback disk" systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
