Concerning the Classical Cepheid VIc Wesenheit Function's Strong Metallicity Dependence
Daniel J. Majaess, David G. Turner, Wolfgang Gieren

TL;DR
This study investigates the metallicity dependence of the classical Cepheid VIc Wesenheit function, finding it to be relatively insensitive, which supports more accurate extragalactic distance measurements and Hubble constant estimations.
Contribution
The paper provides evidence that the Cepheid VIc Wesenheit function's metallicity dependence is negligible, challenging previous claims of strong dependence and proposing a new calibration approach.
Findings
Null metallicity correction consolidates distance estimates.
Strong metallicity correction leads to significant discrepancies.
Cepheid metallicity variations are minor sources of uncertainty.
Abstract
Evidence is presented which supports findings that the classical Cepheid VIc period-Wesenheit function is relatively insensitive to metallicity. The viability of a recently advocated strong metallicity dependence was evaluated by applying the proposed correction (gamma=-0.8 mag/dex) to distances established for the Magellanic Clouds via a Galactic VIc Wesenheit calibration, which is anchored to ten nearby classical Cepheids with measured HST parallaxes. The resulting gamma-corrected distances for the Magellanic Clouds (e.g., SMC, mu(0,gamma)~18.3) are in significant disagreement with that established from a mean of >300 published estimates (NED-D), and a universal Wesenheit template featuring eleven delta Scuti, SX Phe, RR Lyrae, and Type II Cepheid variables with HST/Hipparcos parallaxes. Conversely, adopting a null correction (i.e., gamma=0 mag/dex) consolidates the estimates. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
