Martin's Maximum and tower forcing
Sean Cox, Matteo Viale

TL;DR
This paper explores how certain set-theoretic principles like Martin's Maximum influence the behavior of towers of ideals, showing that under these principles, non-presaturated towers with specific properties can exist, contrasting with prior expectations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Martin's Maximum and related axioms imply the existence of non-presaturated towers of ideals, contrasting with earlier results and expanding understanding of their behavior under strong forcing axioms.
Findings
Martin's Maximum implies non-presaturated towers exist.
Reflection principles restrict presaturation of certain towers.
Martin's Maximum is consistent with precipitous towers.
Abstract
There are several examples in the literature showing that compactness-like properties of a cardinal cause poor behavior of some generic ultrapowers which have critical point (Burke \cite{MR1472122} when is a supercompact cardinal; Foreman-Magidor \cite{MR1359154} when in the presence of strong forcing axioms). We prove more instances of this phenomenon. First, the Reflection Principle (RP) implies that if is a tower of ideals which concentrates on the class of -guessing, internally club sets, then is not presaturated (a set is -guessing iff its transitive collapse has the -approximation property as defined in Hamkins \cite{MR2540935}). This theorem, combined with work from \cite{VW_ISP}, shows that if or holds and there is an inaccessible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
