The matrices of argumentation frameworks
Xu Yuming

TL;DR
This paper introduces a matrix representation for Dung's argumentation frameworks, enabling more computable analysis of argument extensions compared to traditional graph methods.
Contribution
It presents a novel matrix-based approach to represent and analyze argumentation frameworks, linking matrix blocks to extension semantics.
Findings
Matrix representation of argumentation frameworks is feasible.
Matrix approach enhances computability over traditional graph methods.
Potential for applying matrix theory to argumentation research.
Abstract
We introduce matrix and its block to the Dung's theory of argumentation frameworks. It is showed that each argumentation framework has a matrix representation, and the common extension-based semantics of argumentation framework can be characterized by blocks of matrix and their relations. In contrast with traditional method of directed graph, the matrix way has the advantage of computability. Therefore, it has an extensive perspective to bring the theory of matrix into the research of argumentation frameworks and related areas.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
