Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence
Alex Rutherford, Dion Harmon, Justin Werfel, Shlomiya Bar-Yam,, Alexander Gard-Murray, Andreas Gros, Yaneer Bar-Yam

TL;DR
This paper investigates how physical and political boundaries contribute to peaceful coexistence among diverse ethnic groups, using Switzerland as a case study and applying a quantitative conflict theory.
Contribution
It demonstrates that well-defined boundaries, rather than integration, are key to maintaining peace in ethnically diverse regions, supported by empirical analysis.
Findings
Boundaries like mountains and lakes help prevent intergroup violence.
Political boundaries often separate religious groups effectively.
In Yugoslavia, peace correlated with boundary alignment of groups.
Abstract
We consider the conditions of peace and violence among ethnic groups, testing a theory designed to predict the locations of violence and interventions that can promote peace. Characterizing the model's success in predicting peace requires examples where peace prevails despite diversity. Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence. Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained. Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups. Mountains and lakes are an important part of the boundaries between sharply defined linguistic areas. Political canton and circle (sub-canton) boundaries often separate religious groups.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
