Core-Collapse Supernovae and Host Galaxy Stellar Populations

TL;DR

This study analyzes the host galaxy properties of 519 nearby supernovae from SDSS data, revealing correlations between supernova types and their local stellar populations, star formation rates, and metallicities.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of host galaxy environments for different supernova types, highlighting new associations between supernova subclasses and specific stellar population characteristics.

Findings

Type Ic SNe occur in metal-rich, star-forming galaxy centers.

SN Ic-BL and SN IIb explode in blue, low-metallicity regions.

No significant environmental differences found for SN IIn.

Abstract

We have used images and spectra of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to examine the host galaxies of 519 nearby supernovae. The colors at the sites of the explosions, as well as chemical abundances, and specific star formation rates of the host galaxies provide circumstantial evidence on the origin of each supernova type. We examine separately SN II, SN IIn, SN IIb, SN Ib, SN Ic, and SN Ic with broad lines (SN Ic-BL). For host galaxies that have multiple spectroscopic fibers, we select the fiber with host radial offset most similar to that of the SN. Type Ic SN explode at small host offsets, and their hosts have exceptionally strongly star-forming, metal-rich, and dusty stellar populations near their centers. The SN Ic-BL and SN IIb explode in exceptionally blue locations, and, in our sample, we find that the host spectra for SN Ic-BL show lower average oxygen abundances than those for SN Ic. SN IIb host fiber spectra are also more metal-poor than those for SN Ib, although a significant difference exists for only one of two strong-line diagnostics. SN Ic-BL host galaxy emission lines show strong central specific star formation rates. In contrast, we find no strong evidence for different environments for SN IIn compared to the sites of SN II. Because our supernova sample is constructed from a variety of sources, there is always a risk that sampling methods can produce misleading results. We have separated the supernovae discovered by targeted surveys from those discovered by galaxy-impartial searches to examine these questions and show that our results do not depend sensitively on the discovery technique.