Are present reaction theories for studying rare isotopes good enough?
F. M. Nunes, P. Capel, R.J. Charity, A. Deltuva, W.Dickhoff, H., Esbensen, R.C. Johnson, N.B. Nguyen, N.J. Upadhyay, S.J. Waldecker

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent developments in nuclear reaction theories for rare isotopes, assessing their reliability and efforts to improve the accuracy of predicted observables crucial for nuclear structure and astrophysics.
Contribution
It presents recent studies on transfer and breakup reactions, evaluating the reliability of current theories and efforts to reduce ambiguities in predictions.
Findings
Assessment of existing reaction theories' reliability
Efforts to reduce ambiguities in predicted observables
Improved understanding of transfer and breakup reactions
Abstract
Rare isotopes are most often studied through nuclear reactions. Nuclear reactions can be used to obtain detailed structure information but also in connection to astrophysics to determine specific capture rates. In order to extract the desired information it is crucial to have a reliable framework that describes the reaction process accurately. A few recent developments for transfer and breakup reactions will be presented. These include recent studies on the reliability of existing theories as well as effort to reduce the ambiguities in the predicted observables.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear Physics and Applications · Nuclear physics research studies · Isotope Analysis in Ecology
