Infall Times for Milky Way Satellites From Their Present-Day Kinematics
Miguel Rocha, Annika H.G. Peter, and James S. Bullock (Center for, Cosmology, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of California,, Irvine)

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations to link the present-day kinematics of Milky Way satellites with their infall times, providing insights into their accretion history and star formation quenching.
Contribution
It introduces a method to infer satellite infall times from current orbital energies, constrained by simulations and observational data.
Findings
Early accretion of Carina, Ursa Minor, and Sculptor over 8 Gyr ago.
Leo T is likely a recent infall, within the last 4 Gyr.
Star formation histories suggest a dichotomy between ultrafaint and classical dwarfs.
Abstract
We analyze subhalos in the Via Lactea II (VL2) cosmological simulation to look for correlations among their infall times and z = 0 dynamical properties. We find that the present day orbital energy is tightly correlated with the time at which subhalos last crossed into the virial radius. This energy-infall correlation provides a means to infer infall times for Milky Way satellite galaxies. Assuming that the Milky Way's assembly can be modeled by VL2, we show that the infall times of some satellites are well constrained given only their Galactocentric positions and line-of-sight velocities. The constraints sharpen for satellites with proper motion measurements. We find that Carina, Ursa Minor, and Sculptor were all accreted early, more than 8 Gyr ago. Five other dwarfs, including Sextans and Segue 1, are also probable early accreters, though with larger uncertainties. On the other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
