Coding-Theoretic Methods for Sparse Recovery
Mahdi Cheraghchi

TL;DR
This paper explores the deep connections between coding theory and sparse recovery, showing how various combinatorial objects can be transformed into each other to improve understanding and bounds in compressed sensing and related fields.
Contribution
It introduces new reductions and concepts, such as minimum L-wise distance, linking coding properties to RIP-2 matrices and list-decoding, unifying and extending existing theories.
Findings
Unified framework for coding and sparse recovery objects
Introduction of minimum L-wise distance concept
New bounds and relationships between coding and compressed sensing
Abstract
We review connections between coding-theoretic objects and sparse learning problems. In particular, we show how seemingly different combinatorial objects such as error-correcting codes, combinatorial designs, spherical codes, compressed sensing matrices and group testing designs can be obtained from one another. The reductions enable one to translate upper and lower bounds on the parameters attainable by one object to another. We survey some of the well-known reductions in a unified presentation, and bring some existing gaps to attention. New reductions are also introduced; in particular, we bring up the notion of minimum "L-wise distance" of codes and show that this notion closely captures the combinatorial structure of RIP-2 matrices. Moreover, we show how this weaker variation of the minimum distance is related to combinatorial list-decoding properties of codes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Machine Learning and Algorithms
