Combination Strategies for Semantic Role Labeling
M. Surdeanu, L. Marquez, X. Carreras, P. R. Comas

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various inference models for semantic role labeling, demonstrating that learning-based strategies, especially those using max-margin classifiers, outperform existing methods in the CoNLL-2005 shared task.
Contribution
It provides the first thorough analysis and comparison of learning-based inference strategies for semantic role labeling, highlighting the advantages of candidate-level combination and max-margin classifiers.
Findings
All proposed inference strategies outperform previous best results.
Combining models at the candidate argument level is most effective.
Learning-based inference with max-margin classifiers yields superior performance.
Abstract
This paper introduces and analyzes a battery of inference models for the problem of semantic role labeling: one based on constraint satisfaction, and several strategies that model the inference as a meta-learning problem using discriminative classifiers. These classifiers are developed with a rich set of novel features that encode proposition and sentence-level information. To our knowledge, this is the first work that: (a) performs a thorough analysis of learning-based inference models for semantic role labeling, and (b) compares several inference strategies in this context. We evaluate the proposed inference strategies in the framework of the CoNLL-2005 shared task using only automatically-generated syntactic information. The extensive experimental evaluation and analysis indicates that all the proposed inference strategies are successful -they all outperform the current best results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
