Boundary layer structure in turbulent thermal convection and its consequences for the required numerical resolution
Olga Shishkina, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Siegfried Grossmann, Detlef, Lohse

TL;DR
This paper investigates the boundary layer structures in turbulent thermal convection, deriving boundary layer thickness ratios and estimating the minimum numerical resolution needed for accurate simulations across different Prandtl and Rayleigh numbers.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework for boundary layer thickness ratios and a lower-bound estimate for the numerical resolution required in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection simulations.
Findings
Boundary layer thickness ratios depend on Prandtl number and match simulations.
Derived a lower-bound estimate for mesh nodes needed in simulations.
Number of nodes grows with Rayleigh number as at least Ra^{0.15}.
Abstract
Results on the Prandtl-Blasius type kinetic and thermal boundary layer thicknesses in turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection in a broad range of Prandtl numbers are presented. By solving the laminar Prandtl-Blasius boundary layer equations, we calculate the ratio of the thermal and kinetic boundary layer thicknesses, which depends on the Prandtl number Pr only. It is approximated as for and as for , with . Comparison of the Prandtl--Blasius velocity boundary layer thickness with that evaluated in the direct numerical simulations by Stevens, Verzicco, and Lohse (J. Fluid Mech. 643, 495 (2010)) gives very good agreement. Based on the Prandtl--Blasius type considerations, we derive a lower-bound estimate for the minimum number of the computational mesh nodes, required to conduct accurate numerical simulations of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
