Spherically Averaging Ellipsoidal Galaxy Clusters in X-Ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Studies: II. Biases
David A. Buote, Philip J. Humphrey (UC Irvine)

TL;DR
This paper quantifies biases introduced by spherical averaging of ellipsoidal galaxy clusters in X-ray and SZ observations, revealing small mean biases but significant scatter depending on orientation and cluster shape.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of orientation biases in cluster observables and offers polynomial approximations to correct for these biases in ellipsoidal NFW models.
Findings
Mean biases are generally small (<1%) but can be significant for flat models.
Scatter in Y_SZ and concentration can be as large as 10%.
Mass estimates near r_2500 are within 0.5% of true mass regardless of orientation.
Abstract
This is the second of two papers investigating the spherical averaging of ellipsoidal galaxy clusters in the context of X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) observations. In the present study we quantify the orientation-average bias and scatter in observables that result from spherically averaging clusters described by ellipsoidal generalizations of the NFW profile or a nearly scale-free logarithmic potential. Although the mean biases are small and mostly <1%, the flattest cluster models generally have a significant mean bias; i.e., averaging over all orientations does not always eliminate projection biases. Substantial biases can result from different viewing orientations, where the integrated Compton-y parameter (Y_SZ) and the concentration have the largest scatter (as large as sigma ~10% for Y_SZ), and the emission-weighted temperature (T_X) has the smallest (sigma < ~0.5%). The very…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
