Cosmological Information in Weak Lensing Peaks
Xiuyuan Yang (1,4,5), Jan M. Kratochvil (2), Sheng Wang (3), Eugene A., Lim (5,6), Zoltan Haiman (1,5), Morgan May (4) ((1) Columbia University, (2), University of Miami, (3) KICP, University of Chicago, (4) Brookhaven National, Laboratory, (5) ISCAP, Columbia University

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that weak lensing peak counts contain significant non-Gaussian cosmological information, providing improved constraints on parameters like w, sigma_8, and Omega_m beyond the power spectrum alone.
Contribution
It shows that weak lensing peak counts offer additional non-Gaussian cosmological information and improve parameter constraints when combined with the power spectrum.
Findings
High peaks are dominated by single massive halos.
Medium peaks result from multiple halos and noise.
Peak counts combined with power spectrum double cosmological sensitivity.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that the number counts of convergence peaks N(kappa) in weak lensing (WL) maps, expected from large forthcoming surveys, can be a useful probe of cosmology. We follow up on this finding, and use a suite of WL convergence maps, obtained from ray-tracing N-body simulations, to study (i) the physical origin of WL peaks with different heights, and (ii) whether the peaks contain information beyond the convergence power spectrum P_ell. In agreement with earlier work, we find that high peaks (with amplitudes >~ 3.5 sigma, where sigma is the r.m.s. of the convergence kappa) are typically dominated by a single massive halo. In contrast, medium-height peaks (~0.5-1.5 sigma) cannot be attributed to a single collapsed dark matter halo, and are instead created by the projection of multiple (typically, 4-8) halos along the line of sight, and by random galaxy shape noise.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
