Comparing star formation models with interferometric observations of the protostar NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. I. Magnetohydrodynamic collapse models
Pau Frau (1), Daniele Galli (2), Josep Miquel Girart (1) ((1), Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (CSIC-IEEC), (2) Osservatorio Astrofisico di, Arcetri (INAF))

TL;DR
This study compares magnetohydrodynamic collapse models with high-resolution polarized dust emission observations of protostar IRAS 4A, demonstrating that certain magnetic field strengths and cloud properties best fit the data, and showing ALMA's potential to distinguish models.
Contribution
It introduces a method to compare detailed collapse models with interferometric polarization observations, constraining magnetic field strength and cloud properties in star formation.
Findings
Best model fit for mass-to-flux ratio >2 times critical
Initial magnetic field strength ~0.5 mG
ALMA can distinguish between different collapse models
Abstract
Observations of dust polarized emission toward star forming regions trace the magnetic field component in the plane of the sky and provide constraints to theoretical models of cloud collapse. We compare high-angular resolution observations of the submillimeter polarized emission of the low-mass protostellar source NGC 1333 IRAS 4A with the predictions of three different models of collapse of magnetized molecular cloud cores. We compute the Stokes parameters for the dust emission for the three models. We then convolve the results with the instrumental response of the Submillimeter Array observation toward IRAS 4A. Finally, we compare the synthetic maps with the data, varying the model parameters and orientation, and we assess the quality of the fit by a \chi^2 analysis. High-angular resolution observations of polarized dust emission can constraint the physical properties of protostars.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
