The First High Redshift Quasar from Pan-STARRS
Eric Morganson, Gisella De Rosa, Roberto Decarli, Fabian Walter, Ken, Chambers, Ian McGreer, Xiaohui Fan, William Burgett, Heather Flewelling,, Klaus Hodapp, Nick Kaiser, Eugene Magnier, Paul Price, Hans-Walter Rix, Bill, Sweeney, Christopher Waters

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of the first high-redshift quasar from Pan-STARRS1, demonstrating the survey's capability to identify distant quasars with significant implications for understanding early universe black holes.
Contribution
It presents the first high-redshift quasar identified by Pan-STARRS1, showcasing the survey's effectiveness in discovering distant quasars and paving the way for future high-redshift quasar searches.
Findings
Redshift of 5.73 confirmed spectroscopically.
Black hole mass estimated at 6.9 billion solar masses.
Potential to discover over a hundred high-redshift quasars.
Abstract
We present the discovery of the first high redshift (z > 5.7) quasar from the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 1 (Pan-STARRS1 or PS1). This quasar was initially detected as an i dropoutout in PS1, confirmed photometrically with the SAO Widefield InfraRed Camera (SWIRC) at Arizona's Multiple Mirror Telescope (MMT) and the Gamma-Ray Burst Optical/Near-Infrared Detector (GROND) at the MPG 2.2 m telescope in La Silla. The quasar was verified spectroscopically with the the MMT Spectrograph, Red Channel and the Cassegrain Twin Spectrograph (TWIN) at the Calar Alto 3.5 m telescope. It has a redshift of 5.73, an AB z magnitude of 19.4, a luminosity of 3.8 x 10^47 erg/s and a black hole mass of 6.9 x 10^9 solar masses. It is a Broad Absorption Line quasar with a prominent Ly-beta peak and a very blue continuum spectrum. This quasar is the first result from the PS1 high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
