Revisiting the census of low-luminosity AGN
Alessandro Capetti (1) ((1) INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino,, Italy.)

TL;DR
This paper critically reevaluates the census of low-luminosity AGN using SDSS spectra, suggesting that many identified AGN are likely stellar processes, leading to an overestimation of their true numbers and a need for revised understanding.
Contribution
It provides a new analysis of emission line data indicating that most low-luminosity AGN are misclassified, challenging previous estimates and proposing a more accurate assessment.
Findings
Most emission lines in these galaxies are likely from stellar processes.
The true number of low-luminosity AGN is overestimated by a factor of 5-10.
Current identification methods have low purity (~10%) for genuine AGN.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to revisit critically the current census of AGN as derived from optical spectroscopy. We considered the spectra of nearby (z<0.1) galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The equivalent width (EW) distribution of the [O III]5007 emission line is strongly clustered around ~0.6 A, extending the validity of the results we obtained for red giant ellipticals. The close connection between emission lines and stellar continuum points to stellar processes as the most likely source of the bulk of the ionizing photons in these galaxies although their emission line ratios are similar to those of active nuclei. Genuine AGN might be sought mainly among the minority (~5-10%) of outliers, i.e., galaxies with EW>~2 A. The galaxies located in the AGN region of the spectroscopic diagnostic diagrams outnumber outliers by a factor 5-10 which casts doubts on the accuracy of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
