Reconstructing geometric objects from the measures of their intersections with test sets

TL;DR

This paper investigates the minimal number of test sets needed to uniquely reconstruct geometric objects in  from intersection measures, establishing bounds for various families of sets using harmonic analysis and probabilistic methods.

Contribution

It provides new bounds on the number of test sets required for reconstructing geometric objects, including translates and scaled copies, using harmonic analysis techniques.

Findings

For translates of a fixed set, the minimum is d test sets.

For scaled copies, d+1 test sets suffice in .

Reconstruction fails with fewer test sets in , even for simple intervals.

Abstract

Let us say that an element of a given family $\A$ of subsets of $\R^d$ can be reconstructed using $n$ test sets if there exist $T_1,...,T_n \subset \R^d$ such that whenever $A,B\in \A$ and the Lebesgue measures of $A \cap T_i$ and $B \cap T_i$ agree for each $i=1,...,n$ then $A=B$. Our goal will be to find the least such $n$. We prove that if $\A$ consists of the translates of a fixed reasonably nice subset of $\R^d$ then this minimum is $n=d$. In order to obtain this result we reconstruct a translate of a fixed function using $d$ test sets as well, and also prove that under rather mild conditions the measure function $f_{K,\theta} (r) = \la^{d-1} (K \cap \{x \in \RR^d : <x,\theta> = r\})$ of the sections of $K$ is absolutely continuous for almost every direction $\theta$. These proofs are based on techniques of harmonic analysis. We also show that if $\A$ consists of the magnified copies $rE+t$ $(r\ge 1, t\in\R^d)$ of a fixed reasonably nice set $E\subset \R^d$, where $d\ge 2$, then $d+1$ test sets reconstruct an element of $\A$. This fails in $\R$: we prove that an interval, and even an interval of length at least 1 cannot be reconstructed using 2 test sets. Finally, using randomly constructed test sets, we prove that an element of a reasonably nice $k$-dimensional family of geometric objects can be reconstructed using $2k+1$ test sets. A example from algebraic topology shows that $2k+1$ is sharp in general.