Mapping the large-angle deviation from Gaussianity in simulated CMB maps
A. Bernui, M.J. Reboucas

TL;DR
This study assesses the sensitivity of new large-angle non-Gaussianity indicators in simulated CMB maps, finding they detect only large primordial non-Gaussianity and suggesting observed non-Gaussianity may not be primordial.
Contribution
The paper introduces a systematic analysis of the sensitivity of skewness and kurtosis-based indicators to local-type primordial non-Gaussianity in simulated CMB maps.
Findings
Indicators detect non-Gaussianity only for large $f_{NL}^{local}$ values.
Indicators are not sensitive enough within WMAP bounds.
Observed non-Gaussianity likely not of primordial origin.
Abstract
[Abridged] In recent works we have proposed two new large-angle non-Gaussianity indicators based on skewness and kurtosis of patches of CMB sky-sphere, and used them to find out significant deviation from Gaussianity in frequency bands and foreground-reduced CMB maps. Simulated CMB maps with assigned type and amplitude of primordial non-Gaussianity are important tools to determine the strength, sensitivity and limitations of non-Gaussian estimators. Here we investigate whether and to what extent our non-Gaussian indicators have sensitivity to detect non-Gaussianity of local type, particularly with amplitude within the seven-year WMAP bounds. We make a systematic study by employing our statistical tools to generate maps of skewness and kurtosis from several thousands of simulated maps equipped with non-Gaussianity of local type of various amplitudes. We show that our indicators can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
