Greedy Algorithms for Multi-Queue Buffer Management with Class Segregation
Toshiya Itoh, Seiji Yoshimoto

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the competitive ratio of the Greedy algorithm for multi-queue buffer management with class segregation, providing a precise bound based on packet value ratios.
Contribution
It offers a detailed analysis of Greedy's competitive ratio for the general m-valued case, extending previous bounds.
Findings
Greedy is (1+c_{m}^{*})-competitive for the m-valued case.
The paper refines the understanding of Greedy's performance in multi-queue buffer management.
Provides explicit formulas for competitive ratio based on packet value ratios.
Abstract
In this paper, we focus on a multi-queue buffer management in which packets of different values are segregated in different queues. Our model consists of m packets values and m queues. Recently, Al-Bawani and Souza (arXiv:1103.6049v2 [cs.DS] 30 Mar 2011) presented an online multi-queue buffer management algorithm Greedy and showed that it is 2-competitive for the general m-valued case, i.e., m packet values are 0 < v_{1} < v_{2} < ... < v_{m}, and (1+v_{1}/v_{2})-competitive for the two-valued case, i.e., two packet values are 0 < v_{1} < v_{2}. For the general m-valued case, let c_i = (v_{i} + \sum_{j=1}^{i-1} 2^{j-1} v_{i-j})/(v_{i+1} + \sum_{j=1}^{i-1}2^{j-1}v_{i-j}) for 1 \leq i \leq m-1, and let c_{m}^{*} = \max_{i} c_{i}. In this paper, we precisely analyze the competitive ratio of Greedy for the general m-valued case, and show that the algorithm Greedy is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Search Problems · Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms · Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
