Comments on scale invariant but non-conformal supersymmetric field theories
Yu Nakayama

TL;DR
This paper examines whether scale invariant but non-conformal supersymmetric field theories can exist, using perturbative methods, and finds strong evidence against their existence at two-loop order.
Contribution
It provides a perturbative analysis showing the non-existence of such theories at two-loop order and critiques previous claims based on scheme changes.
Findings
Existence of a monotonically decreasing a-function at two-loop order
Obstruction to scale invariant non-conformal theories in supersymmetric models
Critique of scheme change arguments in (4- extepsilon) dimensions
Abstract
We investigate a possibility of scale invariant but non-conformal supersymmetric field theories from a perturbative approach. The explicit existence of monotonically decreasing a-function that generates beta-functions as a gradient flow provides a strong obstruction for such a possibility at two-loop order. We comment on the "discovery" of scale invariant but non-conformal renormalization group trajectories via a "change of scheme" in (4-\epsilon) dimension proposed in literatures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
