The Rise-Time of Normal and Subluminous Type Ia Supernovae
S. Gonzalez-Gaitan, A. Conley, F. B. Bianco, D. A. Howell, M., Sullivan, K. Perrett, R. Carlberg, P. Astier, D. Balam, C. Balland, S. Basa,, D. Fouchez, N. Fourmanoit, M. L. Graham, J. Guy, D. Hardin, I. M. Hook, C., Lidman, R. Pain, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. J. Pritchet

TL;DR
This study measures the average rise-time of Type Ia supernovae using a large survey, finds no evolution with redshift, and compares different subpopulations to understand their explosion characteristics.
Contribution
It provides a new, precise measurement of the stretch-corrected rise-time of SNe Ia and compares different populations, including subluminous supernovae, using consistent methods.
Findings
Average stretch-corrected rise-time is 17.02 days.
No evolution in early lightcurve up to redshift 1.
Subluminous SNe Ia have a rise-time around 18 days.
Abstract
We calculate the average stretch-corrected rise-time of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) in the Supernova Legacy Survey. We use the aggregate lightcurves of spectroscopic and photometrically identified SNe Ia to fit the rising part of the lightcurve with a simple quadratic model. We obtain a lightcurve shape corrected, i .e. stretch-corrected, fiducial rise-time of 17.02^{+0.18}_{-0.28} (stat) days. The measured rise-time differs from an earlier finding by the SNLS (Conley et al. 2006) due to the use of different SN Ia templates. We compare it to nearby samples using the same methods and find no evolution in the early part of the lightcurve of SNe Ia up to z=1. We search for variations among different populations, particularly subluminous objects, by dividing the sample in stretch. Bright and slow decliners (s>1.0) have consistent stretch-corrected rise-times compared to fainter and faster…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
