The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Impact of Environment on the Size Evolution of Massive Early-type Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift
Michael C. Cooper, Roger L. Griffith, Jeffrey A. Newman, Alison L., Coil, Marc Davis, Aaron A. Dutton, S. M. Faber, Puragra Guhathakurta, David, C. Koo, Jennifer M. Lotz, Benjamin J. Weiner, Christopher N. A. Willmer,, Renbin Yan

TL;DR
This study uses data from the DEEP2 and DEEP3 surveys to show that massive early-type galaxies in denser environments at intermediate redshift are larger, supporting models where environment accelerates galaxy evolution via minor mergers.
Contribution
It provides the first observational evidence linking environment to galaxy size evolution at intermediate redshift, emphasizing the role of dry minor mergers in structural growth.
Findings
Galaxies in higher-density regions are ~25% larger than those in lower-density regions.
The size-environment relation supports models of accelerated evolution in dense environments.
Dry minor mergers are likely key drivers of size growth in massive early-type galaxies.
Abstract
Using data drawn from the DEEP2 and DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Surveys, we investigate the relationship between the environment and the structure of galaxies residing on the red sequence at intermediate redshift. Within the massive (10 < log(M*/Msun) < 11) early-type population at 0.4 < z <1.2, we find a significant correlation between local galaxy overdensity (or environment) and galaxy size, such that early-type systems in higher-density regions tend to have larger effective radii (by ~0.5 kpc or 25% larger) than their counterparts of equal stellar mass and Sersic index in lower-density environments. This observed size-density relation is consistent with a model of galaxy formation in which the evolution of early-type systems at z < 2 is accelerated in high-density environments such as groups and clusters and in which dry, minor mergers (versus mechanisms such as quasar feedback) play a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
