Natural selection. I. Variable environments and uncertain returns on investment
Steven A. Frank

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified framework for understanding variability in reproductive success and fitness, emphasizing relative success, diminishing returns, and hierarchical population structure, with implications for biology and economics.
Contribution
It provides a concise, integrated theory of variability in populations, clarifying the structure of fitness measures and their hierarchical nature across traits and individuals.
Findings
Relative success measures fitness through comparison to population average.
Diminishing returns reduce fitness as variability increases.
Hierarchical variability affects individual and population-level success.
Abstract
Many studies have analyzed how variability in reproductive success affects fitness. However, each study tends to focus on a particular problem, leaving unclear the overall structure of variability in populations. This fractured conceptual framework often causes particular applications to be incomplete or improperly analyzed. In this paper, I present a concise introduction to the two key aspects of the theory. First, all measures of fitness ultimately arise from the relative comparison of the reproductive success of individuals or genotypes with the average reproductive success in the population. That relative measure creates a diminishing relation between reproductive success and fitness. Diminishing returns reduce fitness in proportion to variability in reproductive success. The relative measurement of success also induces a frequency dependence that favors rare types. Second,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
