Inconsistence of super-luminal Cern-Opera neutrino speed with observed SN1987A burst and neutrino mixing for any imaginary neutrino mass
D. Fargion, D. D'Armiento

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the superluminal neutrino claims from Opera-Cern, showing conflicts with observed supernova neutrino data and neutrino oscillation models, suggesting a likely calibration error in the experiment.
Contribution
It analyzes various theoretical models to reconcile superluminal neutrino speeds with existing observations, ultimately arguing for an experimental calibration issue.
Findings
Superluminal neutrino speeds conflict with SN1987A observations.
Neutrino oscillation data contradict models with imaginary or split neutrino speeds.
Calibration errors likely explain the superluminal neutrino results.
Abstract
We tried to fit in any way the recent Opera-Cern claims of a neutrino super-luminal speed with observed Supernova SN1987A neutrino burst and all (or most) neutrino flavor oscillation. We considered three main frame-works: (1) A tachyon imaginary neutrino mass, whose timing is nevertheless in conflict with observed IMB-Kamiokande SN1987A burst by thousands of billion times longer. (2) An ad hoc anti-tachyon model whose timing shrinkage may accommodate SN1987A burst but greatly disagree with energy independent Cern-Opera super-luminal speed. (3) A split neutrino flavor speed (among a common real mass relativistic neutrino electron component and a super-luminal neutrino {\mu}) in an ad hoc frozen speed scenario that is leading to the prompt neutrino de-coherence and the rapid flavor mixing (between electron and muon ones) that are in conflict with most oscillation records. Therefore we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
